More doubts surface about the Intoxilyzer 8000
In Ohio, the police use a breath testing machine called the Intoxilyzer 8000. Here in Georgia we use a similar version of this machine, the Intoxilyzer 5000. I, like most defense attorneys who are members of DODD (Defense of Drunk Drivers), advise my clients to question any results taken from the Intoxilyzer. We know, and have known for years, that the Intoxilyzer has vulnerabilities.
Until last week Ohio defense lawyers didn't have this option. Because the Intoxilyzer 8000 is approved by the state of Ohio, evidence submitted about breath tests there couldn't be challenged. Until now. Their state supreme court looked at evidence submitted by defense lawyers and agreed just a few days ago that simply having the prosecutors and police decide that results from a machine are accurate isn't good enough.
Two things in particular troubled the judge:
1. evidence suggesting radio interference from cell phones can skew the results given by the Intoxilyzer 8000. Apparently this model was never tested specifically to see if its performance can be altered by radio interference used by smartphones, and
2. "police officers using the machine can drive up the numbers they get for blood-alcohol levels by the way they administer and record a test." And,
a. officers can drive up blood-alcohol level results simply by having a person blow into the machine for a longer time. "The longer you blow, the higher your score."
The judge decided results from the machine can be admitted as evidence in drunk-driving cases, but that defense attorneys can now call experts to dispute those results in a case-by-case basis.
This is fabulous news for our friends in Ohio. But it is also fabulous news for the rest of the nation as well. Having a state supreme court acknowledge that this machine can be deliberately manipulated by police may affect cases in other states. Insisting that a machine must be properly tested in appropriate field conditions can only prevent innocent people from being arrested for having an improper blood alcohol reading.
In the meantime, Ohio officers have been told that if they are uncomfortable using the Intoxilyzer 8000, they can use an older model machine that has previously been cleared for use by the state. How much do you want to bet that this machine hasn't been field tested with cell phone interference and can be manipulated by the person administering the test?
Atlanta DUI Lawyers Clark & Towne
|